1. The Defendant: KRW 35,00,000 to Plaintiff A; KRW 15,00,000 to Plaintiff C; and each of them, from December 4, 2013 to October 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 2004, the Defendant recommended Plaintiff C, who lacks intellectual ability in Suwon-si, to the effect that “the Plaintiff was engaged in the sexual traffic and divided profits,” and obtained Plaintiff C’s consent by soliciting Plaintiff C to the same effect. On March 2004, approximately one month after Plaintiff C’s birth and around March 2004, Plaintiff A, a relative student of Plaintiff C, also obtained Plaintiff C’s consent to the same effect.

B. From March 2004 to May 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had Plaintiff C reside in the said place from around May 20, 2014; and (b) had Plaintiff A engage in sexual traffic with the average of three to five gender buyers per day; and (c) received KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00

C. In the case of Plaintiff C, the total intelligent index 51 by K-WAS-IV, the social community well-being 12 years of age, and the social index (I Q) 28.33 as a result of the inspection of the community well-being. In the case of Plaintiff A, the total intelligent index 48 by K-WAS-IV, the social age 8.5 years of age, and the social level of 28.33 years of age.

The Defendant was prosecuted for violating the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. due to the above criminal facts, and was sentenced to imprisonment on January 13, 2017 and sentenced to one year and six months (U.S. District Court 2016No6318), and the above judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 10 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The judgment on the cause of the claim is examined, and according to the above facts, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for mental damage, since it is reasonable to deem that the plaintiffs suffered mental damage, since the defendant is liable to compensate for damages, since it is reasonable to deem that the plaintiffs suffered mental damage, by inducing them to engage in sexual traffic for a long period of about 10 years, using the intellectually disabled persons whose ability to make their own decisions is insufficient.

Furthermore, the amount of damages.