The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the conclusion of innocence in the first instance court on the grounds that there was no proof of the crime of intimidation among the facts charged in the instant case.

Examining the records in light of the relevant legal principles, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of law by misapprehending the legal principles as to notice of harm and injury in a crime of intimidation.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed against the guilty portion of the judgment of the court below, but there is no description of the grounds for objection in the petition of appeal and the appellate brief.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.