A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From 14:30 on February 19, 2014 to 15:50 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by driving the disturbance on the part of the victim C, including: (a) “D” operated by the victim C from the packaging end of each trade name; (b) “I will pay the alcohol value to the victim; (c) I will pay taxes; and (d) I will pay the alcohol value to the victim; and (d) I will bring the disturbance to the package for about one hour.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of C’s simple statement Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act: The history of a large number of identical crimes; favorable circumstances: It shall be decided as per the disposition on the grounds of the reflection of one’s mistake, recovery of damage to the victim, and exemption from punishment;