A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 08:30 on August 18, 2015, the victim C operated by the victim C in Seo-gu Seo-gu Gwangju had 2,00 won of the market price on the display stand.

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the property owned by the victim.

2. Interference with business;

A. On August 18, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime, from around 09:10 to around 09:40 on August 18, 2015, 2015, it was difficult for the Defendant to have avoided disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as receiving a claim from the victim C about the theft of rice tea by the Defendant from the victim C at the place indicated in paragraph (1) from around 09:10 to around 09:40.

B. On October 5, 2015, on the grounds that the Defendant did not work as the victim’s credit at the place indicated in paragraph (1) from around 10:35 to around 10:50 on October 5, 2015, the Defendant was able to satisfed about 15 minutes, such as “I have no satch, satch, satch, satch, satch, satch, satch, satch, satch.” The Defendant was able to avoid the disturbance between 15 minutes, such as where I want to drink the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's business of rice tea house twice by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the prosecutor of the prosecution on the victim;

1. Partial statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes entered in an investigation report (related to confirmation of the detailed statement of handling a reported case related to thief incident);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act; Article 329 of the Criminal Act; Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act; and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, which increases concurrent crimes;