Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Criminal facts

피고인은 부산 동래구에 있는 D 시장 번영 회 회장인바, 2015. 9. 25. 23:00 경 부산 동래구 D 시장 내에서 영업 중인 피해자 E이 운영하는 ‘F 떡집’ 과 피해자 G가 운영하는 ‘H 떡집’ 이 다음날부터 시작되는 추석 연휴를 앞두고 떡을 찾는 고객들의 주문에 맞추어 떡을 제조하기 위하여 야간 작업을 하고 있는 것을 잘 알고 있었음에도 평소 피해자들이 시장 번영회의 방침에 잘 따르지 않는 것을 괘씸하게 여겨 오던 중 폐점시간 (23 :00) 을 초과하여 영업을 한다는 이유로 위 점포들에 전기를 공급하는 배 전함의 메인 스위치를 차단하여 전기 공급을 중단시키고, 위 점포들에 공급되는 가스 선로를 차단하여 가스 공급을 중단시킴으로서 위력으로 피해자들의 떡 집 운영에 관한 업무를 방해한 것이다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. Each photograph (14 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of statutes governing business regulations (58 pages of investigation records), minutes (73 pages of investigation records), investigation reports (related to access certificates, 357 pages of investigation records);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument is that the victims did not observe the business hours set forth in the regulations on the operation of the D market prosperity, and thus, the victims' stores were prevented from supplying electricity and gas as stated in its reasoning based on the business regulations regarding the violation. Thus, the defendant's act constitutes a justifiable act under Article 20 of the Criminal

2. Determination

A. "Acts that do not violate social norms" as defined in Article 20 of the Criminal Act refers to social ethics that is being placed in the spirit of the entire legal order or its hinterland.