1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim extended at the trial room, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant.

1. Basic facts and

2. The reasoning of this court concerning this part of the defense prior to the merits is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Accordingly, this Court shall accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

At the second 8th, “The owners of each store as of the date of the closing of the argument in this case are as follows.” The owners of each store as of July 30, 2014, as of the date of the resolution of the Plaintiff’s general meeting as of July 30, 2014, are as follows:

B. Of the eight pages following the second one, the “J” of the owners of the real estate injury 8 shall be changed to “Y”.

C. The 6th 1 and 2th 2th 1st 1st 2th 1st 2st 2st 2st 2st 2st 2st 20 “N is a legitimate representative of the Plaintiff as of the date of the closing of the appellate court’s argument. It is reasonable to see N as at the date of the closing of the appellate court’s argument, each week 1st 2016. The date of the resolution on the change of the representative asserted by the Defendant is May 27, 2016. The litigation including the institution of the lawsuit by the Plaintiff’s attorney appointed by N will be lawful.” The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff is not obligated to pay the 501 and 502th 50th 50th 2th 202 of the commercial building of this case to November 2015, the Defendant, who is the owner of the commercial building of this case, is not obligated to pay the 114,365646th 202th 20 of the management fees.