logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.02.06 2013고정928
상해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around 11:30 on February 19, 2012, at the second floor of G resting area located in the F of the Chungcheongbuk-gun, and the H regular close-down meeting was being proceeded with, but the victim I (the age of 45) was forced to enforce liability due to the bad accounting problem.

Defendant

The defendant B of A reported that the victim would raise his words to his her her son, and he saw the part of the victim's neck once after the victim's son, and flaps of the victim.

이윽고, 피고인 A는 다른 사람과 대화를 하고 있는 피해자에게 다가가 갑자기 손으로 피해자의 얼굴을 1회 때리고, 발로 피해자의 허리 부위를 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendants suffered injury to the victim, such as the impairment of salvity in the part of the wooden part that requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness I, J, K and L;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol against J;

1. Each police statement made to K, L, and I;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to record notes (I, K currency content);

1. Relevant provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants’ choice of punishment: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. In order to prevent the proceedings of the defendant A from interfering with the proceedings of the defendant A, who is the chief secretary of the clan, by taking the victim's gathering at a clan meeting, and taking a bath to the defendant A, the defendant B committed violence to the extent that the defendant A, his father, even her son, can kill the victim's her breater with his son or her breath, with his son, etc., and this constitutes a justifiable act that does not violate the social rules.

2. According to the judgment of the court below, it is recognized that the defendants caused the injury to the victim by assaulting the victim, such as booming the victim's breath, or walking with her cream, etc.

arrow