beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On March 20, 2015, the Defendant, against the victim B, made a false statement to the victim B, stating that “The victim B had only one of the current limits, but later, paid a full payment of the time limit, if the time limit is transferred, 500,000 won, in lieu of the payment of the time limit.”
However, at that time, the Defendant was only one million won monthly average income, but there was no intention or ability to make changes in a normal way even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party, since the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party on the ground that there was no real estate or deposit, and there was no intention or ability to make changes.
Nevertheless, as such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and allowing the victim to pay 500,000 won in lieu of the Defendant, obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount from that time, from that time, and by deceiving the victim over 11 times, such as the statement in the list of crimes, until December 24, 2015, and thereby, acquired pecuniary benefits by allowing the victim to pay 20,214,000 won in total from the victim, or by allowing the victim to pay her paid her paid her paid her paid her paid her paid her or to pay her paid her paid her paid her paid
2. On June 25, 2015, the criminal defendant against the victim C stated that “E” in the “E” located in Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, was false to the victim C, “I wish to subscribe to the number system organized by the party, and three shares are changed by the number of front lines to be paid in good faith.”
However, as described in the above Paragraph 1, the Defendant was merely 1 million won monthly average monthly income, but there was interest exceeding 5 million won per month by lending bonds exceeding a total of 20 million won from the son. Since there was no real estate or deposit, there was no other property such as real estate or deposit, there was no intention or ability to pay the fraternity payment normally even if he received money from the injured person under the pretext of guidance.
Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.