logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.07.11 2016가단146198
양수금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 44,577,380 and KRW 20,433,446 among them.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the arguments stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8 and evidence Nos. 10, the defendant company approved the Membership Regulations on August 28, 2008, by applying for membership of the Industrial Bank of Korea for the payment of the purchase price of the credit card, and entered into a membership agreement with the Industrial Bank of Korea to comply with the interest rate set by the Industrial Bank of Korea. The defendant Eul jointly guaranteed the defendant company's obligation to pay the above credit card purchase price to the Industrial Bank of Korea; the defendant company was issued with a credit card (C) at the Industrial Bank of Korea as of June 18, 2015; the Industrial Bank of Korea was unable to pay the principal amount of 20,43,446 won and delay damages to the plaintiff; the Industrial Bank of Korea was set at 24% per annum, the Industrial Bank of Korea was the Industrial Bank of Korea on May 28, 2015; the defendant company transferred the above credit card management loan to the defendants; the defendant's obligation to pay the above credit card management loan No. 26484.7.6.7.

Although the Defendants asserted that the statute of limitations for commercial claims had expired, according to each of the evidence Nos. 2-1 and 8, the Defendants asserted that the Defendant Company paid KRW 548,451 to the Plaintiff on October 12, 201, and that the Plaintiff may recognize the fact that the Plaintiff applied for the instant payment order on August 30, 2016, the statute of limitations had been interrupted on August 30, 2016, and thus, the Defendants’ assertion has no merit.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim.

arrow