logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.18 2016누44270
탈세부패신고에따른 민원처리의무 부작위위법확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

annex.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the plaintiff's assertion in the trial at the trial at the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the trial at the court of first instance, and even if the statement of evidence Nos. 5 and 6 additionally submitted in the trial at the court of first instance, it is difficult to deem that the plaintiff has the right to standing to sue on the ground that it is difficult to deem that the plaintiff has the right to request the defendant to exercise the right to impose taxes on the public officials who are third parties, and therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance at the court of first instance

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the statement on the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as is by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. As such, the conclusion of the judgment of the court of first instance which rejected the instant lawsuit is justifiable, and the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow