1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition of the following determination as to the matters alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance to the extent that Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are cited.

2. Additional determination

A. In a case where a disadvantage is added to the Plaintiff’s assertion, if the above assistant is a burden, it is possible to file an appeal seeking revocation of the burden only with the other party to the act of beneficial administrative act, so there is no right to file an appeal seeking alteration or withdrawal of the burden after the lapse of the period of filing the appeal, but if the above assistant is not a burden, the other party to the act of beneficial administrative act cannot file an appeal seeking revocation of the assistant director, so in this case, even after the lapse of the period of filing the appeal against the act of beneficial administrative act, the right to file an appeal seeking alteration of the act of beneficial administrative act should be acknowledged by asserting the illegality of the assistant director with respect to the act of beneficial administrative act.

Therefore, since the terms and conditions of this case are not a burden, the notice of the selection of this case has an excessive dispute over the time limit for filing a lawsuit.

Even if the terms of this case added to the instant notice of selection are unlawful, the Plaintiff has the right to seek a change in the instant notice of selection.

B. As the judgment of the first instance court properly determined, there is no provision recognizing the right to request the alteration or withdrawal of an additional official, such as the Act on Urban Parks, Greenbelts, etc., in relation to the notification of the selection of the instant case, and there is no provision recognizing the right to request the alteration or withdrawal of the additional official, which is added to the administrative disposition, such as the notification of the selection of the instant case.

In addition, the terms of this case are as follows.