logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 10. 25. 선고 2018두53788 판결
(심리불속행) 압류해제를 거부한 것이 신의성실원칙에 위배하지 않음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-84541 (Law No. 18, 2018)

Title

(C) If the cancellation of attachment does not violate the principle of trust and good faith; or

Summary

(Summary of the Judgment of the Supreme Court) The reason for cancellation of attachment did not occur, and the response following the confirmation of the amount in arrears cannot be deemed as a public statement of opinion due to the confirmation of facts, and it does not violate the principle of

Related statutes

Article 53 of the National Tax Collection Act

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow