beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 7,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
The Defendants respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendants are married couple's death.
1. Defendant A
A. The Defendant drafted a written complaint on February 2, 2012.
The contents of the complaint are as follows: "The victim D on April 13, 2005 lending KRW 50 million to the victim D on April 13, 2005, and punishment is changed as it is not repaid after the loan."
However, the defendant was well aware that he did not lend 50 million won to the victim D on April 13, 2005.
Nevertheless, on February 2, 2012, the defendant submitted the above complaint to a public official who is unable to know the name of the public service center in the Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Police Station.
Accordingly, the defendant was committed against the victim D with the aim of being subject to criminal punishment.
B. On May 24, 2012, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the case No. 310, 2012 high order 1173, 1684 (Joint) of the Victim D, which was committed by the Defendant, and gave testimony.
The defendant, although he did not have a linen of KRW 50 million in cash to the victim D, he lent KRW 50 million on April 13, 2005 to the victim D even though he did not have a linen.
The victims D are different in cash;
in cash. The payment was made in cash.
“A testimony contrary to his memory” was presented for perjury.
2. On May 24, 2012, Defendant B appeared as a witness in the case at the court No. 310 of Suwon Friwon, 2012, 1173, 1684 (Joint) with respect to the victim D, and gave testimony.
Despite the fact that the defendant had observed that there was KRW 50 million in cash during the number of the defendants A, the defendant considered that "A had the KRW 50 million on April 13, 2005 with the money of KRW 50 million.
50 million won in credit cooperative;
10,000 won notes were integrated into rubber lines, and put them in shopping bags.
“A testimony contrary to his memory” was presented for perjury.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. Sentence 1173, 1684, 2411 (Consolidation) judgment and Suwon District Court Decision 2012No. 4609, 5958 (Joint Judgment) judgment and Suwon District Court
1. Each protocol of examination of witness;
1. A copy of the complaint;