logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.10.30 2014고정548
상해
Text

Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of 600,000 won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, KRW 50,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B around 03:00 on November 17, 2013, while running a platform game in the F Party of Operation of Victim E located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, D, it was drunk with other customers, and C, while making it difficult to do so. B, the victim E market in the location was 150,000 won at the victim E market in the location, and damaged it by lowering it on the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The summary of the facts charged was around 03:0 on November 17, 2013, Defendant A: (a) francing the victim B (the age of 53) with e-mail at the F Party in the operation of the E-gu located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si; and (b) francing the victim into the e-mail, resulting in the victim’s injury on the right side and the lower part of the wall that requires approximately four weeks of treatment.

2. Although there are statements, pictures, and injuries in the investigation agency B and this court as evidence as shown in the facts charged in the instant case, according to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, each of the above evidences is insufficient to be admitted beyond a reasonable doubt that it is difficult to believe that Defendant A was injured or injured.

B’s statement (1) B, at the time of the occurrence of the instant case, stated that “at the time of the examination of the suspect at the Namyang Police Station, the Defendant was “at the time of fighting with the Defendant A, he did not have any flabbb with one another, and was drinking from the Defendant A” (the investigative record page 35), and submitted to the said police station a written agreement that he would not want criminal punishment between the Defendant A and both assault cases.

(2) However, B is later Defendant A.

arrow