(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.01.06 2014고단2683

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.01.06 2014고단2683

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for a period of one and half years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of D-si.

On February 26, 2014, at around 00:20, the Defendant: (a) carried the victim E (the age of 36) who is a passenger on the back left the front seat; (b) proceeded one lane of the three-lane of the rapid speed road between the unit of the powder in the Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, into the G Aburg-dong of Sungnam-si, and went into the G Aburg-dong of Sungnam-si; (c) came into operation in the G Aburg-dong of Sungnam-si; and (d) proceeded in the opposite lane beyond the central line, the Defendant got into operation at a normal speed of 121km from the front of the Furg-ri road in the front of the Furg-si; and (d) went into operation at the top speed of about 257 meters from the front of the front wall of the Furg-si at the right speed of 121km in speed.

At the same time, it is not easy to see the front door at night, and there is a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by observing 90km at a limited speed, since there was a place where the defendant does not drive normally and there was a difference in road circumstances.

Nevertheless, without complying with the speed limit, the Defendant proceeded at a speed of about 84 meters from the front side of the above protective wall to 125km per hour, and discovered the protective wall to the front side of the right side to avoid this, but the above FF, which opened a competition on the right side of the road, is running rapidly while operating it on the left side, but it was inevitable to operate the Hand as the left side, but it was not avoided by the above protective wall as a front part of the taxi, and caused the victim who was on the back side of the cab to be faced with the head inside the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim’s death by occupational negligence on the spot by having the victim die due to cerebral cerebral cerebralop.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. An interrogation protocol of F by prosecution;

3. A traffic accident report (1) (2).

4. A corpse of corpse;

5. Breamboxes.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.11.19 2015고합30

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.08.08 2013고단1200

-울산지방법원 2016.12.15 2016고단3617

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.10.01 2019고단1553

-대구지방법원 2016.06.29 2016나1999