logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2015.09.09 2015고정200
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant forged an application for joining a mobile phone in B’s name with the picture that he had kept his resident registration certificate No. B in custody, and had the intention to open a mobile phone.

Around June 5, 2013, the Defendant presented the resident registration certificate of 'D' to 'D' mobile phone agencies in Yannam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and conducted the work as B. The Defendant signed B by 'B' in the customer name column, 'E' in the customer name column, 'E' in the resident registration number column, 'E' in the address column, 'G' in the applicant number column, 'B' in the applicant column, 'B' in the applicant column, and 'B' in his name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a written application for joining the mobile phone in B, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), exercised the right to file a falsified mobile phone application with H, an agent of the aforementioned mobile phone, who was unaware of the forgery, as if the document was duly formed.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place stated in paragraph 1, was not B, but was planned to open and use the mobile phone in the above B’s name without permission from B, and was used as B, and had the mobile phone used, and had the victim’s agent agent fee paid for the installment of the mobile phone and the telecommunications service fee. As such, the Defendant deceptioned H, which was the victim’s agent owner, and submitted an application for the registration of the mobile phone in the above forged name B.

The Defendant, even though he received mobile phone communications services from the victim from around June 5, 2013 to May 2014, failed to pay the victim totaling KRW 382,434 to pay the victim the charges for paying the mobile phone installments and the charges for using the telecommunications services.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. I, .

arrow