A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

No person shall arrange, etc. sexual traffic for business purposes.

The defendant, at around February 16, 2017, was equipped with business facilities such as 4, shower facilities and simplified beds in Ulsan-gu B, Ulsan-gu, B, and promised to provide 50,000 won out of 100,000 won to female employees D, and then, on February 16, 2017, the defendant received 10,000 won from E visiting the above C as customers and arranged commercial sex acts so that the above D may interfere with the similarity, thereby engaging in commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A written statement;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act and selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Protective observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act (the scope of recommendations) is that there is no person who has a basic area (referring to six months to one year and four months of imprisonment) (the commission, etc. of sexual traffic through the receipt, etc. of business or consideration) [the sentence] [the defendant has arranged sexual traffic for business purposes from June 1, 2016 to July 14, 2016] C “a person who has been sentenced to a fine of KRW 7 million on November 30, 2016, which was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,00,000,000 from the same place within a short period of time. In addition to the above fine, there is more history of punishing the defendant in violation of the Food Sanitation Act of 197 as well as the motive, means and consequence of the crime in this case, the defendant’s age after the crime in this case, and various environmental records and conditions, etc. shall be considered.