A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Kameras and other crimes);

A. On August 8, 2015, the Defendant, at the early 03:00 Seo-gu Daejeon Daejeon, taken pictures of the Defendant’s mobile phone-based sexual intercourse with a female infinite name on the part of a private person, while having sexual intercourse with a female infinite name on the part of the private person.

As a result, the defendant taken the body of another person, who could cause sexual humiliation or shame, using a camera or other similar mechanism, against his will.

B. On August 22, 2015, at around 02:30 on August 22, 2015, the Defendant taken pictures of the Defendant’s cell phone-based sexual intercourse with the victim E (n, female, and age 43) at the mutual influence in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon.

As a result, the defendant taken the body of another person, who could cause sexual humiliation or shame, using a camera or other similar mechanism, against his will.

2. On August 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) sent the victim a dynamic image, which took a face of a sexual intercourse with the victim E, with the victim; and (b) had the victim take the image as if he were to spread it in another place; and (c) had the victim take money from the victim with the victim’s sexual intercourse.

The Defendant, from September 11, 2015 to October 12:47, 2015, from around 23:57 to around 23:57 to around 12:47, 2015, “The Defendant has been a person who is selling to 5 head Kakaox” to the victim’s Kakaoox, and one million won and the video is bad, and the recall of the tao does not occur;

Sending text messages to the effect that if you do not have to pay money, such as "I have no choice but to spread a sexually related video," they may spread such a video.

The victim was frightened by the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant attempted to bring one million won from a person who was frighted to frighten by threatening the victim as above, but did not have the intent to make a report to the victim, but did not have to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1.Kakao Stockholm.