1. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant C, jointly with Defendant B, share the amount of KRW 30,420,000 and each of the above amounts.

The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of the evidence Nos. 1 through 18, evidence Nos. 1 through 18, evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including paper numbers), witness B’s testimony (B’s testimony is limited to the relation to Defendant C), appraiser D’s appraisal results, the fact inquiry results of this court on E(U.S. release on bail), and the purport of the entire pleadings in the course of the Plaintiff’s questioning.

Defendant B maintained friendship with the Plaintiff for a long time. On May 201, 201, Defendant B stolen one half of the half of the Plaintiff’s ownership (one half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half.

Following that, Defendant B showed that the Plaintiff was able to see and see through snow, and that the Plaintiff was fluorous from the Plaintiff on the respective meaning of the Plaintiff’s counter-land.

However, the above defendant concealed the theft by neglect and did not return it.

On February 17, 2012, Defendant B disposed of the Ban to Defendant C in the amount of KRW 500,000 on bail.

Defendant C does not return (or does not return) the cost of the original earthquake that was imminent in the radius to the Plaintiff.

According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant B constituted a tort by intention, and Defendant C constituted a tort by intention or negligence.

The defendants are jointly and severally liable for damages of the plaintiff.

The plaintiff asserted the price of half of half of half of the amount of damages of the plaintiff is KRW 65 million (=one half of half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the amount of damages of the plaintiff = KRW 10 million (one of half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the total of KRW 50

We examine the evidence on the market price of the expenses, which is the main part of the half of the expenses.

① The written estimate (Evidence A) of KRW 50 million, as shown in the Plaintiff’s assertion, cannot be accepted as it is on the ground that there are no grounds to deem it more reliable than the result of the appraiser’s appraisal.

(2) The Plaintiff’s statement stating that “as at the time of appraisal in 2001, approximately KRW 25 million has been appraised.”