Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

Punishment of the crime

[Status of Defendants B] From around December 2017, Defendant C was in charge of the duties such as vehicle dispatch and management, customer counseling, etc. from around September 2017 to the F in the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building E.

Defendant

A From February 1, 2018, from around February 1, 2018, he/she worked as the above F's place of business and has overall control over its affairs.

[Detailed Criminal Facts]

1. Defendant B and C did not clearly know the existing defects or damage caused to the customer when returning the vehicle due to the failure of the customer to accurately inspect the vehicle condition at the vehicle siren, and even if the customer claims that the existing defects were incurred, the customer cannot take any particular response. In the event of the demand for the repair cost, the customer who did not have any material to be imprisoned is aware of the fact that the demand for the repair cost is likely to cause a larger problem, and that the customer would have to respond to the demand of the Defendants.

Defendant

B around January 2018, around 2018, Defendant C removed repair expenses by taking account of the fact that the existing defects were caused by the customer and the strong attitude of the customer at the time of returning a siren vehicle to Defendant C.

In addition to the above methods in March 2018, the author proposed that one of the Defendants would have accepted it, and in addition to the above methods, the other among the Defendants would have caused the defect on the vehicle, and the other would have opened the repair cost by acting as if the customer had caused the defect on the vehicle, and by taking strong attitude as if he had caused the defect on the vehicle.

Accordingly, Defendant C at the above F Office around January 16, 2018, demanded repair expenses to the victim G (19 tax) as if the victim G did not pay repair expenses, and if the victim G did not pay repair expenses, the victim G did not return to his house, and the victim G did not pay repair expenses to the H bank account in the name of Defendant C. 300,000.