logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.09.12 2012가합95696
용역비
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 2,236,80,000 to the Plaintiffs and 5% per annum from November 30, 2012 to September 12, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a partnership that obtained approval for establishment from the head of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on May 10, 2012 pursuant to the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) for housing reconstruction projects (hereinafter “instant reconstruction projects”) consisting of the project implementation district of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 172,040.06 square meters (hereinafter “instant project area”). The Plaintiffs are companies registered as management contractors under Article 69 of the Urban Improvement Act.

B. The Urban Development Promotion Committee (the name was changed to the promotion committee for the establishment of the CHousing Reconstruction Project Association; hereinafter “instant promotion committee”) constituted around June 17, 200 to promote an urban development project in the instant project area.

C. 1) The instant promotion committee is the Plaintiff Korea Appraisal Board Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff Korea Appraisal Board”).

On November 16, 200, the project management consulting service provider for an urban development project is selected as a consulting service provider for the project management of the urban development project, and the contract was entered into between the Plaintiff Korea Appraisal Board and C on November 16, 200. The contract amount is as follows: Article 3 (Scope of and Consideration for the Project Management) of the decision to consult at the time of this contract:

arrow