Defendant

A Imprisonment for a period of two years and six months, imprisonment for a period of three years, and imprisonment for a period of one year and six months, respectively.

(b).

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) of the Defendants are working as the head of the education center at the headquarters of the victim D (hereinafter “victim”) and the head of the direct management team at the headquarters of the headquarters. Defendant B works as the education team members, the management support team members, the business planning team members, etc. of the victim company. Defendant C is a person in charge of the management of the service company. Defendant C is a person in charge of the management of the service company. Defendant C is a person in charge of the management of the service company. Defendant C is a person in charge of the business of dispatching and managing the employees of the cosmetics sales store operated by the victim company. The service company E (hereinafter “E”) and the F (hereinafter “F”).

Defendant

A around October 2010, around October 2010, the victim company and the service company engaged in a transaction with the victim company would have the victim company receive the difference by means of claiming excessive service cost from the victim company, and provided the defendant C with the service cost infusing the difference. After the defendant C claimed excessive service cost from the victim company and received it, the defendant C instructed the victim company to return the difference. The defendant B requested that the victim company claim the difference and return the difference according to the above order. The defendant C consented to this.

Defendant B, following the above public offering on January 201, 201, provided Defendant C with the contents of service costs unrefilledd to Defendant C; Defendant C demanded excessive amount of service costs to the victim company according to the above contents; Defendant A, by deceiving the person in charge of the funding execution department of the victim company by making an interim approval on the letter of non-payment of the service costs proposed by Defendant B, etc.; and Defendant A, which was subject to said deception, received KRW 4,631,570 from the victim company to E account from that time until July 2016, as well as received KRW 4,631,570 from the victim company to the E account.