logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.12.18 2016가단512298
부당이득금
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s KRW 55,947,848 and its amount from July 3, 2016 to December 18, 2018.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall be deemed to be combined.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a D vehicle owned by C (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

(C) The term “instant insurance contract” refers to the term “instant insurance contract” which provides for the liability for damages incurred by the said automobile operation to a third party due to the occurrence of the accident resulting from the said automobile operation.

(ii) The insurer is the insurer that entered into the insurance contract (insurance period: from April 1, 2015 to July 1, 2015). 2) The main parts of the general terms and conditions of the instant insurance contract and the special terms and conditions of the automobile injury, relating to the instant case, are as shown in the separate sheet.

(The amount of insurance coverage of the above special terms and conditions for motor vehicle injury is KRW 20 million per person in case of death, KRW 30 million per person in case of injury, KRW 20 million per person in case of disability, and KRW 200 million per person in case of disability.)

At around 10:31 on May 26, 2015, E, the insured insured at the same time, driving the instant vehicle, and driving the instant vehicle in the direction of a gas station at Hh room where the distance intersection is not divided into the G oil station behind the G oil station located in B, and the relevant place is where the housing is not well in the situation of traffic on the right side and the right side. Therefore, when intending to enter the intersection of the same vehicle at the same time, the order of priority has a duty of care to yield the way to the right side road and prevent the accident from spreading, even though it has been negligent in performing the duty of care to prevent the accident from spreading, Non-Party I's driver's failure to take care of it in advance through the 1 ton of the freight vehicle in the right side of the instant vehicle and caused the collision between the instant vehicle and the wall that is pushed into the right side of the instant vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant traffic accident”). C.

The defendant's injury and treatment details, and de facto marriage E at the time of the traffic accident in this case.

arrow