The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant who misleads the misunderstanding of the facts of the grounds for appeal posted the comments on the E candidate's website is not false, but it was not aimed at preventing the E candidate from being elected to the National Assembly member at the time of posting the comments on the above comments.

The sentence of the court below against the illegal defendant in sentencing is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s judgment as to the assertion that the facts were not false, and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the party, it is sufficient to view the content published by the Defendant through comments on the website of E as false facts.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's assertion is rejected.

1) Details of the Defendant’s writing on the E’s website were written by comments, and the Defendant did not directly verify the facts prior to the instant crime. The Defendant did not directly verify the facts prior to the instant crime.

In addition, from 2002 to 2003, one defendant was her prior to the death of I ( June 8, 2009).

2) The Defendant submitted L and M’s confirmation at an investigative agency on the ground that the Defendant’s writing on comments is true, and submitted a record recording of R and S’s factual confirmation and dialogue with T and U.S. in the trial of the Party.

However, the purpose of each of the above certificates and records is only the unilateral assertion that I lives in the N's container box box located in the official domains, or the statement that I appeared from others in the official domains, and there is no evidence to support the fact.

3) After the establishment of politics, I had lived in the E-friendly family of the Republic of South-Namnam (E) in Seoul and received diagnosis of waste cancer two years prior to his death.