Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2013 Highest 2648" is a person who operates a party hall of a trade name D from P in leisure C and the second floor.

No person shall provide game products, the contents of which are different from the classification, for distribution or use, or display or keep the same for such purposes.

Nevertheless, from October 7, 2013 to September 1 of the same month, the Defendant, unlike the contents rated by the Game Rating Board in the above party room, set up two game software games, which are changed to “TIMF function” in the game screen “TIMF function,” and offer them for the use of customers who have called the above party room.

around December 12, 2013, the Defendant, “2014 Highest 247,” set up two game software games, which were changed in the form of a common electricity from the Game Rating Board, different from the contents classified by the Game Rating Board, and provided them for the use of customers who found the above party hall.

Summary of Evidence

"2013 Highest 2648"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. "J UNGLE (GGLE) 2014 order 247";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E’s letter of authorization;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Investigation reports (open game machine conversion methods), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 45 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, the Selection of Punishment, and Articles 45 subparagraph 4 and 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, and the Selection of Fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order is a crime of this case, since the defendant, immediately after being sentenced to a fine for the same crime, was placed under the control and operation of another game machine during the investigation, and the crime is again discovered.