(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.01.11 2017고합264

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.01.11 2017고합264

의무경찰대설치및운영에관한법률위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 10, 2017, the Defendant completed the basic military education course at a naval education center, and was transferred on August 19, 2017 and received a new education at an education center for the maritime police and transferred on September 1, 2017 to a female maritime police station.

around 17:00 on October 10, 2017, the Defendant, while working within the guard (C) at a wharf for the exclusive use of the coast guard, was reinstated after leaving his work place after borrowing laundry work and moving to D apartment at the time of leisure, which is a residence.

In addition, on October 11, 2017, the Defendant, while working in the above guard zone on at least 17:30 on at anchor, moved to the above residence with the reason that he borrowed the waste treatment work, and went away from work place to the patrol station, and returned again.

The Defendant was subject to five days’ disciplinary action as above by leaving two or more places of work.

Nevertheless, the defendant, at around 05:30 on October 30, 2017, was performing duties in the department E of the Coastal Police Station E located in the Yellow Sea Police Station E, the defendant left the place of work in a way beyond the wall on the right side of the relevant river station.

On November 1, 2017, while continuing to move to a bus terminal in the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city, the GPC room located in the FPC located in the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the 12:40

Accordingly, the defendant left his workplace with a view to evading service.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A list of reports on findings of investigations by auxiliary police officers and personnel records of auxiliary police officers;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs with regard to the escape of auxiliary police officers;

1. Article 9 of the Act on the Establishment and Operation of Police Officers under the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts.

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.01.16 2017고단1196

-광주지방법원 2017.10.17 2016노5037

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.03.29 2017고단2555

-광주지방법원 2019.02.14 2017구단10961

-부산지방법원 2019.02.19 2018고단4250