logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2012.12.27 2012고단698
사기
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person working as the head of the Krench City Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do, and A and B are insurance solicitors working for interesting State Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. that are victims, and the Defendant, as a result, intentionally caused the 3th generation of the Do Do Do Do Do Do Do do Do do Do do Do do Do do Do do Do do Do Do do

On November 7, 2011, at least 23:40, the Defendant, A, and B moved along the M of A driving on the road near the Chambro-dong in order to take place, and thereafter stop in the order of the Defendant’s driver’s NV and L driver’s O in the order of priority, and even if L, which was driven by the following, intentionally caused the three-way protruding accident by towing the above two vehicles stopped in the order of the above two vehicles stopped, the Defendant and the Defendant, but the following caused the sudden accident. However, L, which was driven by the vehicle immediately, was called to the employee in charge of insurance handling the victim’s Mez Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. in the name of the victim’s Mezz and fire insurance company, to receive the accident as if the above traffic accident occurred frequently, and by deceiving the employee in charge by submitting relevant documents, such as the written diagnosis of injury, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with A, B, and L, by deceiving the staff in charge of the victim company by the above method, received 12,891,860 won in total of insurance money such as agreed money from the victim company, and obtained it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each suspect interrogation protocol of the prosecution against A;

1. Some statements in the suspect examination protocol of the prosecution concerning B;

1. Some statements among prosecutor's offices and police suspect interrogation protocols concerning L;

1. Each police statement to S, T or U;

1. Forwarding results of analysis of information on insurance fraud suspicion;

1. The details of each S Data to be submitted (A and G on each date, details of the receipt of insurance proceeds for each accident, details of the accident, etc.);

arrow