1. Of the judgment of the first instance against the Defendants, the part that was reversed by the judgment of remand, i.e., this Court prior to remand.

1. Regarding the judgment of this court prior to the remanding of Japan with the same amount as the plaintiffs 1 and 2, the Supreme Court reversed only the part against the plaintiffs in this court judgment prior to remanding of this Court, and dismissed the defendants' appeals, and only the part of winning the plaintiffs quoted in this court prior to remand of this Court shall be included within the scope of this court's judgment (i.e., the part excluding the part of supplementary appeal within the scope of the above plaintiffs' claims, "the cited in this Court prior to transmission" in Tables 1 and 2 shall be subject to the judgment of this court). 5% from the day after the day of this court's remanding of this Court 1 to 10. 5% per annum from 200 to 10. 5% per annum from the day after the day of this court's remanding of this Court to 25% per annum 10, 205% per annum from May 30 to 15, 2016 to the day of complete repayment of this Court's judgment.

2. The reasons why the court of the first instance as to this case are stated are as follows. Thus, Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is the same as the reasons why the part against the plaintiffs and the defendants in the first instance judgment except for the dismissal as set forth in paragraph (2) below.