logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014. 12. 24. 선고 2014두40890 판결
이 사건 소는 이미 소멸하고 없는 처분에 대한 것으로 부적법 각하[각하]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2014Nu44504 ( March 30, 2014)

Title

The lawsuit of this case is dismissed as illegal as against a disposition not yet extinguished.

Summary

Since the defendant can be known that the disposition of this case was revoked ex officio on October 10, 2014, which was subsequent to the appeal, the plaintiff's lawsuit of this case is dismissed as being illegal as it is about the disposition of this case which is not extinguished.

Related statutes

Article 32 of the Administrative Litigation Act

Cases

2014Du40890 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

Economic Zone

Defendant-Appellee

O Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2014Nu44504 Decided July 30, 2014

Imposition of Judgment

December 24, 2014

Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked, and the lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

Reasons

According to the records, the defendant can be found to have ex officio revoked the disposition of this case on October 10, 2014, which was after the appeal. Accordingly, the plaintiff's lawsuit of this case was illegal as to the disposition that was not extinguished.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below shall be reversed, and since this case is sufficient for the court to directly judge, the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked and the lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed. The total costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant pursuant to Article 32 of the Administrative Litigation Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

arrow