logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.07.25 2018고단2558
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for eight months, respectively.

except that from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Defendant B was sentenced to the suspended sentence of ten months for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act in Seoul Southern District Court on April 19, 2017, and sentenced to two years for probation, two years for protection observation, 40 hours for pharmacologic treatment, and 80 hours for community service, and the judgment on April 27, 2017 became final and conclusive.

【Criminal facts】 The Defendants are not narcotics handlers

1. Defendants

A. On January 1, 2016, around 23:00 to 24:00, the Defendants administered in a way that they laid a scrophone on the front day of the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building 319, and the front day of the croding, heated the scrophone by heating it into the scroding, and flowed.

B. On November 2016, the Defendants administered a large amount of philophones in the same place as described in the foregoing paragraph (a) at the same time as described in the foregoing paragraph (a) at the same time.

(c)

On December 2, 2016, the Defendants administered philophones in the manner described above (A) from 23:00 to 24:00 Kacheon-si D Officetel 904B around 200, 2016.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to administer philophones over three times.

2. Defendant B’s Defendant 1-C.

(c) At the time and place of entry, paragraph 1-c.

As described in the paragraph, approximately 0.1g of philopon was provided to Defendant A free of charge.

3. The Defendant, as described in paragraph (2), failed to take a way to administer 0.1g of philophones at around 23:00 the following day following the receipt of the philophones as described in paragraph (2), at around 23:0, in the trade influent telephones room located in Busan, the Defendant failed to take an attempt in the middle of the wind where the extension of the administration of 2.1g of philophones cannot take place in the manner described in paragraph (1) A.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A report on investigation (calculated additional collection charges);

1. A response to a request for appraisal (No. 19 No. 5 of the evidence list);

1. Previous convictions: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, report on investigation (B), and confirmation of the period of probation of the suspect;

arrow