1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The appeal costs.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "this court" shall be changed to "court of the first instance"; "No. 7 or 10" shall be changed to "No. 7 or 10"; "No. 9 or 14 or "No. 7 or 10" shall be changed to "No. 9 or 14 and No. 11" shall be changed to "Expert of the first instance court"; "No. 6 No. 1 or 10" shall be changed to "No. 6-1 or 10"; "No. 6-1 or 10" shall be changed to "No. 6-1 or 10"; "No. 13 or 17" shall be changed to "the court of the second instance"; "No. 2 or 13-13-2" shall be changed to "the second instance court's office"; "No. 2 or 4-13-2" shall be admitted to the following part of the court's office of the case where the plaintiff's office of the second instance's office of this case was changed to the reasons.

In full view of the statements in Gap 10, 13, and 14 as well as the whole purport of the arguments in response to the order to submit financial transaction information to the Kochio Nonghyup Bank in this Court, the plaintiff and his husband are the mother of F, the representative of the defendant, and H, the plaintiff entered into the instant construction contract with the defendant, and the plaintiff was remitted from the account in the name of the plaintiff I to the account in the name of F, and paid as a substitute on the day. The plaintiff transferred KRW 27,300,000 on April 25, 2012 to the account in the name of F, and as above, KRW 27,30,000 on April 25, 2012, and KRW 25,300,000 on April 25, 2012.