logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.06.21 2017고단1088
명예훼손등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant’s defamation is a hospital, not a hospital treating human beings, at the front of the D Hospital located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul around September 22, 2016.

The author has become a father to wait for the death of the D Hospital by wrong surgery.

D Hospital is the hospital of which human life is dead at will and at O.I.D.

(b) The low will receive the left-hand A-line operation from the D Hospital.

그런 데 의사의 오진과 무지로 멀쩡한 부위에 엉뚱한 수술을 하였습니다.

D Hospital did not perform any appropriate operation on the left-hand side of the patient with intention and on the patient's upper-hand side.

' 라는 내용의 글이 기재된 팻말을 들고 시위를 하였다.

그러나 사실은 피고인은 2013. 2. 8. 피해자 E이 운영하는 D 병원에서 갑상선 좌 엽전 절 술 및 중앙 경부 림프 절제술을 받아 멀쩡한 부위에 엉뚱한 수술을 받은 것이 아니며, 이로 인하여 피고인이 시한부 선고를 받은 것도 아니었다.

이로써 피고인은 공연히 허위의 사실을 적시하여 피해자의 명예를 훼손한 것을 비롯하여 2016. 9. 26. 경까지 별지 범죄 일람표 기재와 같이 5일에 걸쳐 같은 방법으로 허위의 사실이 기재된 팻말을 들고 시위함으로써 피해자의 명예를 훼손하였다.

2. The Defendant interfered with the operation of the victim’s hospital by spreading false facts at the D hospital operated by the victimized person at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph 1, as if he/she were to mislead the injured person into performing the surgery for the patient and thereby undermining the trust in D hospital, thereby hindering the victim’s operation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Non-prosecution decision;

1. The application of the Act and subordinate statutes on site photographs of one human demonstration;

1. Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (referring to defamation and comprehensive defamation), Articles 314(1) and 313 of the Criminal Act (referring to interference with business, inclusive) of the said Act;

1. The Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act.

arrow