1. On December 30, 2014, the Defendant confirmed that the disposition rejecting reappointment made against the Plaintiff on December 30, 2014 is invalid.

2. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The defendant concerned is a school foundation that establishes and operates a C junior college, and the plaintiff was appointed to C junior college on March 1, 2006 and was in office as an assistant professor at the time of 2014.

The defendant notified the plaintiff that "if the plaintiff wishes to be reappointed because the appointment period expires on February 28, 2015, the defendant's refusal disposition against the plaintiff to be reappointed." The plaintiff filed an application for reappointment.

3. 2-related provisions: Article 53-2 of the Private School Act, Article 8 (1) 4 of the Regulations on the Appointment Review Committee for Fixed-term Teachers of C Universities and Staff Guaranteeing Age Limit, and Article 4 (2) of the Personnel Management Regulations.

4. 1) Grounds for refusing to be reappointed. The examination of research records (as to the evaluation part - the examination of research records submitted by the Plaintiff - the examination of the research records submitted by the Plaintiff - the two professors belonging to the Royan Abuse School and the one professor belonging to the Honam Abuse School.

However, on the ground that it is difficult to regard all the above three persons as a research performance with academic value, the "U" was assessed on the ground that it is difficult to view them as a research performance with academic value, and the personnel committee in the university composed of seven persons determined that the total sum of the ordinary points prescribed in Article 8 (1) 4 of the Regulations on the Appointment Review of Fixed-term Teachers and the Appointment Review Committee of Staff Guaranteeing Age would be below 60