1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if each evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, except for the addition of the following ‘2. Additional Judgment' as to the argument that the defendant adds to this court, and therefore it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. The defendant asserts that he paid all the price for the product supplied by the plaintiff.

In full view of the purport of the entire arguments in Eul evidence Nos. 3 and 5 (including various numbers), the defendant's assertion that the defendant remitted the above amount to the plaintiff to the plaintiff on July 26, 2008, USD 500,000 on March 16, 2009, USD 30,000 on June 30, 2009, USD 40,000 on September 7, 2009, USD 24,485 on April 21, 2010, USD 25,000 on June 3, 2010, USD 24,000 on June 11, 2010, USD 200 on June 26, 2010, and USD 19,260 on December 22, 2010 on each of the above evidences cannot be acknowledged as having been submitted separately by the defendant on each of the above loans.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.