1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited is as follows, and except for the addition of Paragraph 2 to the judgment on the conjunctive argument that the defendant raised in this court, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance as to the defendant is stated in the reasoning. Thus, this is acceptable pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

" May 11, 2006" at the bottom of 3 pages 8 shall be changed to " around May 2006 and around July 2 of the same year".

The term "local government" of the 9th 2th 3th eth eth eth 11th eth eth eth eth eth eth.

The 10th parallel "2010du4612" shall be deemed to be "2010da67593".

2. Judgment on the Defendant’s conjunctive assertion

A. The defendant's assertion is asserted as follows on the premise that, pursuant to Article 23 (1) 1 of the instant trust agreement, Pakistan, the truster of the instant trust agreement, has a right to claim the allocation of the amount equivalent to the taxes and public charges imposed on the Bank, the trustee, as a taxpayer.

1) Since the bankruptcy trustee in the first instance court has recovered the right to manage and dispose of the bankruptland against the right to claim the distribution of the settlement amount upon waiver of the appeal against the judgment of the first instance court of this case, the defendant is entitled to exercise the right to claim the distribution of the settlement amount on behalf of the creditor in Pakistan. 2) The defendant attached not only the right to claim the distribution of the settlement amount to the bank in Pakistan on May 19, 2016, but also the right to claim the distribution of the settlement amount on January 28, 2018 and May 30, 2018, after the right to manage and dispose of the bankruptland was restored, the right to claim the distribution can be directly exercised as the person entitled to the seizure and collection of the above right to claim the distribution.

In addition, the defendant seized the right to claim the distribution of the above settlement amount on October 18, 2010, prior to the declaration of bankruptcy against Pakistan, and the declaration of bankruptcy does not obstruct the continuation of the disposition on default prior to the declaration of bankruptcy. Thus, the above right to claim the distribution as a person entitled to the seizure and collection within the scope of KRW 10,25,970, remaining amount of claims