The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., both types of punishment) of the lower court’s sentencing (a fine of two million won) is too unreasonable.

2. There are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant is in depth of his mistake, and that the defendant has been in a simple manner by reporting the D No.D classe and has committed the instant crime in a contingent manner, and is in an unspared environment economically and economically.

However, in order to protect legitimate performance of official duties and to establish sound social order, the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties requires strict punishment, and in particular, the crime of this case was committed once by scambling the chest, and the nature of the crime is bad. In full view of all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's sentence is too unreasonable, and therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. Conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.