1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

(b).

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, in addition to supplementing the following determination as to the plaintiffs' assertion, and thus, it is consistent with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In light of all the circumstances such as the two-lanes of two-lanes, there was no hindrance in the view of the view of the accident, and the time of the accident was not much more than 02:50 at night, and there was no particular difficulty in identifying the Defendant’s vehicle parked by the Deceased at the location of the accident. The accident in this case occurred during the time of returning to and from work of the store where the Deceased worked as an employee, and it appears that the location of the accident in this case was not an string, and the Deceased appears to have not been an string, and it appears that there was a proximate causal link between the act that D parked in the Defendant’s vehicle at the location of the accident in this case and the accident in this case.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims should be dismissed in entirety due to the lack of reasonable grounds.

The decision of the first instance court with the same conclusion is justifiable, and all plaintiffs' appeals are dismissed.