1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the modification of Paragraph 2 (2) of the judgment of the court of first instance (No. 3, No. 6, and No. 10) as follows, and therefore, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. The modified part of the construction cost of this case transferred KRW 82,00,000 and C Boxes, D Middle Schools and E, to account in the name of the Plaintiff, the representative director, and the Plaintiff’s sewage supplier, a total of KRW 68,713,808 for the payment of the unpaid construction cost of KRW 6,190,000 for convenience facility construction of this case. The Defendant asserts that the industrial safety and environmental preservation cost of KRW 5,00,000 borne by the Education Support Office of Jeollabuk-do, which is the place of the order of the construction of this case, should be deducted from the construction cost, and thus, the unpaid construction cost of this case is merely KRW 14,476,192 (=the construction cost of this case which is not paid by the Defendant) (i.e., KRW 6,190,000 for other unpaid construction cost of this case - KRW 73,713,808).

Defendant 2-O 20, X 20.12.12, 12, 22,727, 273 (States) G 2,00, 300, 300, 200 G 2,000 on January 30, 2013, 20-14 2-14, 50,000, 10, 200, 200, 30.10, 200, 30, 100, 200, 200, 20, 30,000 won 2-15, 20,000, 30,000 won 2-15, 25,000 won 2,00,000 won 2,000,000 won 25,000 won 30,000 won