logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.07.03 2015나2801
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: the "Tru Co., Ltd." in Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as "on the port item Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "on the port item")"; the "Dominrururururu" in Part 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as "the Dominrururururuia"; the "2.4 billion won" in Part 11 of the second part is as "1.5 billion"; the "Grruruium in the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance" in Part 13 is as "the Dominruia in the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance"; the "Trururuia in the third part" in the third part is as "the equipment development cost"; the "the common operation guidelines of industrial technology innovation" in the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as "the Enforcement Decree of the Industrial Technology Innovation Promotion Act"; and the second part is as stated in the main part of the judgment.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against this is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow