logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.12.20 2013노1017
배임수재
Text

The judgment below

Part concerning Defendant B and C shall be reversed.

Defendant

The sentence against B shall be one year, and the defendant.

Reasons

1. According to Articles 361-2 and 361-3(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with respect to Defendant A’s appeal, when the appellate court has received the records, it shall immediately notify the appellant and the other party of the grounds therefor, and when a counsel is appointed before such notification, the appellant or the counsel shall also notify the counsel of the grounds for appeal. The appellant or the counsel shall submit the grounds for appeal within 20 days after receipt of the notification. If a counsel is appointed after the receipt of the notification of the notification of the receipt of the notification of the trial record to the defendant (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 96Do166, Sept. 6, 196). The same applies where the appellate court appoints a public defense counsel and revokes the appointment of a public defense counsel due to the appointment of the defendant and his/her defense counsel after the notification of the receipt of the notification of the notification of the grounds for appeal.

(2) On September 10, 2013, the defendant's defense counsel appointed a defense counsel on September 11, 2013, and the defendant appointed a defense counsel on September 24, 2013, and the defense counsel appointed a private defense counsel on October 15, 2013, and submitted the appellate brief to the court on March 29, 2007 (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Do5547, Mar. 29, 2007). According to the records, this court served the defendant with the notification of the receipt of the trial records on September 10, 2013. The defendant submitted the appellate brief to the court on October 15, 2013. This is only 20 days after the date on which the public defense counsel or the defendant was served with the notification of the receipt of the trial records.

The grounds for destroying the original judgment against the defendant may be found after investigating the case or ex officio.

arrow