The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

According to the provision of Article 361-2 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, when a defense counsel is appointed before the notification of the receipt of the trial records, the court of appeals shall order the defense counsel to receive the notification of the receipt of the trial records. Thus, if a defense counsel is appointed after the notification of the notification of the trial records to the defendant (see, e.g., Supreme Court Order 65Mo34, Aug. 25, 1965). This is true when the appellate court appoints a public defense counsel and revokes the appointment of a public defense counsel following the appointment of the defendant and his defense counsel after the notification of the notification of the notification of the notification of the trial records to the defendant.

(2) According to the records, the court below, on May 28, 2014, submitted the appellate brief stating unfair sentencing as the grounds for appeal on June 17, 2014 when a private defense counsel appointed for the defendant submitted the appellate brief on the same day, and accordingly, decided to revoke the appointment of a public defense counsel on the same day. After attending the first day of the court below trial as of July 9, 2014, the private defense counsel presented the appellate brief to the same effect as the grounds for appeal on July 21, 2014, on which the court below presented the summary of oral argument demanding the defendant to seek unfair sentencing on the same day as the grounds for appeal. The court below rejected the appeal by the defendant on July 25, 2014.

Examining the above legal principles in light of the above legal principles, the court below is the defendant.