[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

However, the above punishment shall be executed for one year from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 20:20 on February 18, 2020, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E (the age of 63) by drinking alcohol on the part of the victim’s face while drinking alcohol in the Drack-si, Nam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, Nam-si, and the victim E (the age of 63) on one occasion without any particular reason, while drinking alcohol in the Drack-si, Nam-gu, Nam-si, and the victim’s face part and the side part of the victim’s face were sent back to the above Drack-si, and then, the victim suffered injury by drinking alcohol in excess of the victim’s face part and the side part of the Drack-si, which requires treatment for about 28 days.

2. Defendant A, on the date and at the place specified in the above paragraph (1), was injured by the victim’s spathical act against the harmful act of the victim B (the age of 58), and the victim was spawned with spawd and spad for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of each police statement related to F and G;

1. Reports on internal accidents, medical certificates of injury (B), and medical certificates of injury (A);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each inquiry report;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines to Defendant A, and the choice of imprisonment to Defendant B

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant B: The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code [Defendant A] / Defendant A has the power of force of sentence and suspension of execution with violent force. However, in this case, Defendant A’s act of violence is close to the victim. Although Defendant B submitted a written diagnosis of injury that Defendant B requires 2 caution treatment, the degree of injury is extremely minor since Defendant B did not appear on the upper part, although Defendant B submitted a written diagnosis of injury requiring 2 caution treatment, and the degree of injury is extremely minor. On the other hand, Defendant A’s entrance, damage was caused to gring, and the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part is exempted from the upper part.