Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 07:40 on May 4, 2020, the Defendant: “C” restaurant in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, B and 1, without any justifiable reason, was a victim D (29 years of age) who was eating at the same place in the state of under the influence of alcohol, and “a large amount of money, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, with the victim’s knee,” and was off with the victim’s knee, and the victim’s knee, knee, knee, kel.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. At around 10:25 on May 4, 2020, the Defendant: (a) reported on the road in front of the building Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul; and (b) obstructed the above G by: (c) 112 having been requested to return home from G to the border belonging to the Fream Zone of the Seoul Song District Police Station, the Defendant: (d) “A bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch xch bitch xch xch chch chch chch chch chch chch chch chch chch chch chch chch chch chch chch chch ch

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the field photographic images of each investigation report (Handphone image analysis, CCTV image analysis), 112 reported case processing marks, CDs, restaurants CCTV images, etc.;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment was that the Defendant, while drunk in a restaurant, exercised violence against the customers of the wife, and it is not good to obstruct the performance of official duties by assaulting a police officer who is performing official duties. However, the Defendant’s acknowledgement of the instant crime is against the Defendant.