beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On August 25, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the destruction and damage, etc. of a deadly weapon, etc.) destroyed property equivalent to 42.80,000 won in total of the reported price of the victim, such as a clicker, monitor, hot blast, wall, etc., by gathering beer disease, which is a dangerous object on the table, on the ground that the victim told himself/herself that he/she would have known that he/she would go against the Defendant’s daily behavior, around 19:30 on the ground that the victim F (nive, age 54) was able to go against the Defendant’s daily activity. The Defendant destroyed property equivalent to the sum of 4280,000 won in the reported price of the victim, such as destroying a standing signboard outside of the said singing room by cutting it over with a light.
2. Around 20:00 on August 25, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury with a deadly weapon, etc.) caused the victim F to walk the victim’s mouth three times in the singing room as described in paragraph (1) on the ground that the victim F told the Defendant, as above, on the ground that the victim F told him of the said riot, and she was skeing him of the spath, and continuously damaged the signboard outside the said singing room, such as the statement in paragraph (1), on the ground that the victim’s child was at the time when she destroyed the signboard, the victim’s head was frighted, skeed, and was skeed two times in the wall, walked the mouth two times, and broken the beer disease, which is a dangerous thing in the cooling room, and the victim was harming the victim’s wall, and then the victim was faced with with the victim’s injury during the said period.
3. On August 25, 2013, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes by assaulting the police officer one-time and one-time parts of the instant I’s back-to-handbbbbbbs, which was dispatched after receiving a report at the singing room as indicated in paragraph (1), to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1.The police of I.S.