logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.12.13 2018고단2691
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around March 21, 2018, the Defendant, “2018 Godan 2691, the Defendant,” purchased the Victim AU’s C Kaf, “Adi Safast” in the Company B’s C Kaf.

On April 7, 2018, 2018, 1.30,000 won will be sold to the victim.

Contact was made.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the above signals, and even if he received 130,000 won from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the said signals.

On April 7, 2018, the Defendant was transferred KRW 130,000 from the damaged party to the AV bank account under the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

"2018 Highest 2746"

1. On January 17, 2018, at a place where it is difficult to identify the place, the Defendant posted a statement to the Internet website CKaf, stating that “Sales of goods such as three-day lux, etc.” on the Internet website CKaf, and selling the said goods to the victim AW who contacted with the Defendant.

A false statement was made.

However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to sell the said goods to the victim even if he received money from the injured party because the Defendant did not have the said goods.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 650,000 won from the damaged person to the E account (AE) under the name of the Defendant for the same day, and received 590,000 won from the same account under the same name as the around January 25, 2018, and received 480,000 won in total from the same account under the same name as around January 27, 2018.

2. On April 24, 2018, the Defendant posted a letter stating that he/she purchases sports activities by accessing the Internet B, a high-class transaction car page, and contact the victim AX and send the goods.

The term “transfer of money” was false.

However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to sell the said goods to the victim even if he received money from the injured party because the Defendant did not have the said goods.

The Defendant is the victim.

arrow