Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for each of 8 months, for each of 8 months, for each of 6 months, for each of 6 months, for each of 6 months.

(b).

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, on June 2014, after receiving text messages to the effect that “the passbook is calculated,” and made contact with the name-free box (one customer 1) who is the solicitation book of “the passbook”, the fact was established and registered by establishing a company, and using the name of the Defendant’s geographical name as his/her representative, and then opened an account in the name of the corporation and made the passbook, cash card, etc., which is a means of access connected with it, and then assigned the same to the above name-free person. In addition, A conspired to commit these crimes with Defendant B, Defendant D, Defendant C, and Defendant C, each of whom is the Defendant’s seat, notwithstanding the absence of an actual intent to operate.

1. Joint criminal conduct by Defendant A and Defendant D

A. In accordance with the aforementioned public offering, the Defendants held events, such as false entry, false entry, public electronic records, etc., and public electronic records of false entry, etc., on January 2015, 2015, the Defendant D became a representative director and did not intend to actually establish and operate the company, and there was no intent to actually pay the capital to hold the corporation’s office. However, even if the Defendants intended to sell the passbook, cash card, etc. connected with the account opened in the name of the corporation after registering the incorporation of the corporation, they actually paid the capital and actually filed a false application for registration to establish a limited company E and limited liability companyF, and filed an application for the establishment of the corporation with the public official in charge of registration under his/her name.

Accordingly, a public official in charge of the above registration, who is unaware of the fact, entered the electronic data processing system in order to have the registration of incorporation of the limited liability company E and F limited liability company E and F made it possible to keep the said computerized data recording of the corporate register.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to make a false report.