Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay each fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 11, 2017, Defendant A committed an assault against the victim B (51 tax) and the money in relation to gambling that had been previously done at the F real estate office located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si on March 11, 2017.

2. Defendant B, at the same time, and at the same place as in paragraph (1), committed assault against the victim by breathing the victim’s breath while having been in a dispute with the victim A (62 tax) as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each legal statement of witness G, H and I;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the witness A’s legal statement (defendant B)

1. The Defendants: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 260(1) and 260 of the Criminal Act; Articles 260(1) and 26

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant B, at the time and place stated in the facts of the crime, plucked up and plucked up A’s right fingers for about six weeks of treatment, thereby causing an injury to A, at least five water sources, to the right edges requiring treatment.

2. The evidence that Defendant B’s plucking to the fact that Defendant B forced the fingers of Party A is a witness’s legal statement and the statement of the police interrogation protocol (No. 2) against the witness, and the second police interrogation protocol (No. 2, 2, 3) against Party A or its statement, such as the statement of Party A or its statement, are entirely written.

In this regard, the police investigation protocol for A, prepared for the first time after the occurrence of the instant case, did not state that Defendant B 2 plucked or plucked up the fingers of A, or that Defendant B her fingers, and there was G, H, and I in the place at which the instant case occurred, but they did not state that Defendant B her plucked up or plouted up the fingers of A (in contrast, the aforementioned people testified that Defendant B her plle up the bomb in this court, and that the testimony was trusted). In addition, Korea's domestic affairs.