A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 1, 2020, the Defendant: (a) reported on August 14:05, 202 to the effect that the Defendant would drive alcohol at the Defendant’s residence located in B, and received a request for a drinking measurement from the police officer D, or patrolman belonging to C District Group of the G District of the G District Police Station, and was called for a drinking test from E, the Defendant changed the satat to a portable line, and then moved back to the direction of the above E, etc., and then he was towed.

The phrase “Jatata” means having the aforesaid E-bebbridged, and continuing to attract fat in the direction of the above police officer, she shall be asked.

Recognizing that the term “intition” was “a threat.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's protocol of oral statement;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor as provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrent crimes;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, including the circumstance leading to the instant crime, the degree of interference with the performance of official duties resulting therefrom, the defendant's primary crime and the violation of the law, shall be determined as the same as the order, taking into consideration all circumstances.