The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, in the Defendant’s residence in Chungcheongnam-gun, raises a satatus at the Defendant’s residence in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and was going out of the country on April 7, 2016.

The Defendant, the owner of the said fat, has a duty of care to manage the fat fat fat so that the fat fat can be firmly fixed and managed by the fat fat, and correct the fat of the said fat fat, and manage the fat fat fat fat, so that the fat fat fat can not go out of the Defendant’s residence, and the fat fat does not cause any accident, such as fat fat, going out of the Defendant’s residence.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and caused the satatat, which was cut to be cut out of the Defendant’s residence, and around April 7, 2016, around 15:39, the Defendant covered the victim D (8 years of age) who was in the playter after the memorial complex culture center located in the 31st head of the victim, left satbucks, etc.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered two-time medical treatments from the victim due to the above negligence.

2. Determination

(a) Provisions of applicable provisions to charges: Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 266 (2) of the Criminal Act.

(c) Declaration of intention of the victim not to punish him/her after public prosecution is instituted: Submission of a written agreement on September 28, 2016;

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;