logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.05.02 2016고정1039
도로교통법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who owns and drives an tex without a license plate.

1. On October 20, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) driven the above Obane around 16:20 on September 20, 2016; (b) led the front of the road “D” located in Kujin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City), to the front of the headquarters of the former North Bank from the Gidong elementary school.

At the same time, the driver of the Oral Ba was driving by linking the loaded ship to the lower part of the Oral Ba, and in such a case, the driver of the Oral Ba had a duty of care to safely fix the connecting part of the Oral Ba and the loading ship to prevent the occurrence of the accident.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and operated a part of the connection of the loading to the right side of the road without being able to use it properly and without being able to use it properly. The Defendant left it separately from the oba, and was parked on the right side of the loading box.

E At the same time, the lowermost and left-hand gate of the FWz SL500 car shocked the uppermost and lower-hand pentle of the car owned by G, and the lower-hand pentle of the H PW 508 car owned by G.

After all, the Defendant damaged the above food car to cover repair costs of approximately KRW 5,073,630 due to occupational negligence and at the same time damaged the said food car to cover approximately KRW 2,917,610.

2. On October 20, 2016, the Defendant driven the above 1 km section from the front side of the Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1 to the front road of the same Gu C “D” without a driver’s license for a bicycle with a motor device at around 16:20 on September 20, 2016.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, without purchasing mandatory insurance at the same time and place as paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Reporting of a traffic accident (1) (2);

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. On-site photographs and photographs of CCTV accidents;

1. Automobiles;

arrow